13 Best Practices for Determining Email Frequency Without Overwhelming Subscribers

13 Best Practices for Determining Email Frequency Without Overwhelming Subscribers

13 Best Practices for Determining Email Frequency Without Overwhelming Subscribers

Discover the wisdom of industry leaders on mastering the art of email communication frequency to maintain subscriber engagement without causing fatigue. This article distills expert advice into actionable strategies, ensuring that every email counts. It’s about striking the perfect balance – informed by data, tailored to your audience, and refined through continuous optimization.

  • Analyze Data and Segment Audience
  • Test Different Email Cadences
  • Tailor Frequency Based on Engagement
  • Segment Audience by Role and Needs
  • Balance Quality and Quantity
  • Test Frequencies and Optimize Timing
  • Adjust Frequency Based on Engagement
  • Sync with Audience Needs
  • Use Industry Benchmarks for Cadence
  • Respect Audience’s Attention
  • Personalize Email Frequency
  • Segment and Test for Optimal Frequency
  • Use Event-Based Email Triggers

Analyze Data and Segment Audience

Determining the optimal email frequency required a mix of data analysis, A/B testing, and audience segmentation. We started by analyzing engagement metrics such as open rates, click-through rates, and unsubscribe rates to identify patterns in audience behavior. By segmenting our subscribers based on their activity levels, we customized email cadences—sending more frequent emails to engaged users while reducing the frequency for less active ones.

One notable example of improving engagement through email cadence adjustment was when we noticed a drop in engagement due to over-emailing. We ran an A/B test: one group received emails twice a week, while the other received them once a week. The latter saw a 15% increase in open rates and a 10% higher click-through rate, indicating that reducing email frequency prevented fatigue and improved responsiveness.

Additionally, we introduced AI-driven send-time optimization, ensuring emails were sent when subscribers were most likely to engage. This personalization strategy further enhanced overall engagement and reduced unsubscribes. By continuously monitoring data and adjusting based on real-time insights, we have been able to maintain a balance between staying top-of-mind and avoiding inbox fatigue, leading to a healthier and more engaged email list.

Divya GhughatyalDivya Ghughatyal
Digital Marketing Consultant, Gleantap


Test Different Email Cadences

Finding the optimal email frequency for my audience came down to data analysis and A/B testing. At first, we sent weekly emails, assuming more touchpoints would keep our brand at the forefront of our customers’ minds. But engagement started dropping, and unsubscribe rates crept up. Instead of guessing, we tested different cadences—daily, twice a week, and biweekly—while tracking open rates, click-throughs, and unsubscribes.

One of the biggest breakthroughs came when we segmented our list based on engagement levels. Highly engaged users responded well to two emails per week, while less active subscribers preferred a biweekly schedule. After adjusting, open rates increased by 22%, and unsubscribes dropped significantly.

The key was listening to audience behavior instead of forcing a one-size-fits-all approach. Email frequency should balance keeping users engaged without overwhelming them. Testing different cadences, analyzing subscriber behavior, and allowing them to set preferences gave us the best long-term results.

Georgi PetrovGeorgi Petrov
CMO, Entrepreneur, and Content Creator, AIG MARKETER


Tailor Frequency Based on Engagement

Determining the optimal email frequency for our audience was an iterative process based on both data analysis and feedback. Initially, we started with a weekly email cadence, but over time, we realized that engagement varied across different segments of our audience. We analyzed open rates, click-through rates, and unsubscribe rates to determine how often each segment was engaging with our emails. Through A/B testing, we found that our highly engaged users responded well to more frequent emails, while less engaged users preferred fewer touchpoints.

After adjusting our cadence—sending more personalized, timely emails to active users and scaling back for others—we saw a significant boost in overall engagement. For example, when we switched to a bi-weekly schedule for a less active segment, our unsubscribe rates dropped by 15%, and our open rates increased by 20%. This approach allowed us to tailor our frequency to the needs and preferences of different groups, ultimately improving overall engagement without overwhelming our audience.

Vaibhav NamburiVaibhav Namburi
Founder, Smartlead.ai


Segment Audience by Role and Needs

We determined email frequency by segmenting our email list into three groups: engineers, procurement officers, and operations managers. Each group had different content needs and tolerance levels. Engineers preferred deep dives, so monthly emails worked well. Procurement professionals only opened emails once a quarter, while operations managers engaged most when we sent a brief every six weeks. Consequently, we stopped sending emails to everyone at the same pace and started tailoring the cadence according to each role.

After implementing this change, our overall open rate increased from 29% to 46% within two months. Our reply rate on procurement-specific content doubled. One email titled “New Cost-Benefit Models for Wind Barriers—Save $120K in 3 Years” generated six inbound quote requests from a single group of 80 contacts. The lesson learned? Frequency is only effective when it aligns with the rhythm of the readers.

Barbara RobinsonBarbara Robinson
Marketing Manager, Weather Solve


Balance Quality and Quantity

Testing and adjusting email frequency is a balancing act. If you send too many emails, people tune out. If you send too few, they forget about you. I started by looking at engagement data (i.e., open rates, click-through rates, and unsubscribes) and then experimented with different cadences.

One of the biggest improvements came when we reduced our weekly updates to biweekly for customers who had already booked an international move. Initially, we sent updates every week, thinking more communication would be helpful. Instead, engagement dropped because customers felt overwhelmed. When we spaced emails out and focused on the most relevant information, such as customs regulations or what to pack at each stage, open rates jumped by 20% and fewer people unsubscribed.

It proved that quality matters more than quantity. People appreciate useful information at the right time rather than constant updates. Now, we adjust based on where a customer is in their moving journey, making sure they get what they need without inbox fatigue.

Hugh DixonHugh Dixon
Marketing Manager, PSS International Removals


Test Frequencies and Optimize Timing

We conducted a four-month test with email frequencies set at weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly across three states. Queensland unsubscribed quickly from weekly emails—the unsubscribe rate reached 4.8%. New South Wales performed well with bi-weekly emails, but Victoria showed the highest engagement when we emailed once every 28 days. This was surprising, but the data was clear and convincing.

After establishing that cadence, we focused on optimizing the timing. Tuesdays at 10:30 a.m. had the best open rate—consistently around 40%. One subject line that performed exceptionally well was “Is Your Bill $140 More Than It Should Be?” That campaign alone generated 71 callback requests in five days. While frequency is important, pairing it with optimal timing proved to be the key to success.

Benjamin TomBenjamin Tom
Digital Marketing Expert and Utility Specialist, Electricity Monster


Adjust Frequency Based on Engagement

Finding the right email frequency is all about testing and listening to your audience. There’s no one-size-fits-all approach, so I started with 1-2 emails per week and adjusted based on open rates, click-throughs, and unsubscribes.

One specific case: For an e-commerce client, we initially sent 4 emails per week–two promotional, one newsletter, and one personalized. While revenue remained stable, unsubscribes increased. We adjusted to 3 emails per week, focusing on storytelling, education, and one promotional email. This led to a 22% increase in click-through rates and a 15% drop in unsubscribes within a month. The key was balancing value with promotions.

If you’re optimizing your email cadence:

1. Start with a baseline and test engagement over a month.

2. Segment your audience to personalize frequency.

3. Mix content types to keep emails engaging and avoid fatigue.

Priyanka PrajapatiPriyanka Prajapati
Digital Marketer, BrainSpate


Sync with Audience Needs

We used heatmaps and link clicks across a term calendar to figure it out. For example, engagement spikes in the last week of each term when schools are preparing for reports, events, and compliance. So, we dialed back to three key emails per term—week one, week five, and week nine. That cadence mirrors their actual needs. After we adjusted, clickthrough rates increased from 5.8% to 13.2%.

One email we send mid-term includes tips from other schools using Compass, often quoting real administrative staff. That shift—from pushing product to sharing peer practice—changed the tone and trust. It made the timing feel less corporate and more in sync with their rhythm. If you want them to click, synchronize with their stress.

Andreea TucanAndreea Tucan
Marketing Lead – Uk & Ie, Compass Education


Use Industry Benchmarks for Cadence

Examining industry benchmarks helped us determine the appropriate cadence without guesswork. In the B2B space, particularly with video marketing services, the average email frequency typically ranges between one and three times per week. We began with that range, then tested different cadences over a six-week period to observe how our list responded. The goal was to increase open rates while maintaining steady engagement and avoiding list fatigue.

We tested weekly, twice-weekly, and thrice-weekly frequencies. The optimal frequency turned out to be twice a week. This allowed us to share bite-sized content breakdowns, case study clips, and client success snapshots without overwhelming recipients. Once we fine-tuned this approach, our unsubscribe rate decreased by 21 percent, and our click-through rates increased from 2.9 percent to 4.5 percent. It also provided us with sufficient breathing room to space out value-driven content with occasional calls-to-action, such as booking a call or downloading a short guide.

Spencer RomencoSpencer Romenco
Chief Growth Strategist, Growth Spurt


Respect Audience’s Attention

Finding the right email frequency took trial and error. Early on, we sent weekly newsletters, thinking more touchpoints meant better engagement. Instead, open rates dropped, and unsubscribes spiked—it turns out, people don’t want their inbox flooded. We scaled back to monthly newsletters, packed with only the most valuable insights, and engagement immediately improved. Less frequent, but higher-quality content kept our audience interested.

For personal email sequences, we tested different cadences and found that one email every 3-5 days works best—frequent enough to stay top-of-mind but not overwhelming. When we slowed down overly aggressive follow-ups, reply rates increased, and fewer prospects ghosted us. The key? Respect your audience’s attention—email too much, and they tune you out; email too little, and they forget you.

Ann KussAnn Kuss
CEO, Outstaff Your Team


Personalize Email Frequency

We abandoned traditional A/B testing in favor of what I call “subscriber shadowing”—tracking individual engagement patterns rather than overall metrics. For a recent virtual event campaign, we initially sent daily updates but noticed sharp engagement drops after three consecutive emails.

To address this issue, we created a dynamic schedule that automatically adjusted based on each subscriber’s previous engagement. Active openers received more frequent communications, while others got weekly digests. This approach reduced our total sends by 40% while increasing total clicks by 28%.

I’ve found that email success comes from respecting attention thresholds rather than adhering to rigid schedules. We now use a “3-strike” system where three unopened emails automatically downgrade frequency until re-engagement occurs.

Michelle GarrisonMichelle Garrison
Event Tech and AI Strategist, We & Goliath


Segment and Test for Optimal Frequency

Determining the optimal email frequency for an audience requires a combination of data analysis, A/B testing, and understanding audience behavior. To find the right balance, I first segmented the email list based on factors like purchase history, engagement level, and interests. This allowed me to tailor content and frequency to different groups rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach.

Next, I ran A/B tests with varying frequencies—weekly, biweekly, and monthly—and closely monitored key metrics such as open rates, click-through rates, and unsubscribe rates. I also analyzed engagement trends to identify the best days and times for sending emails. Additionally, feedback from recipients and unsubscribe patterns provided valuable insights; a spike in unsubscribes or complaints about excessive emails indicated a need to scale back.

For one of my clients, we initially sent promotional emails on a weekly basis. Over time, open rates began to decline, and there was an increase in unsubscribes, signaling that the audience felt overwhelmed. To improve engagement, we switched to a biweekly schedule with more curated content, including product highlights, style guides, and exclusive offers. As a result, open rates increased by 18%, and click-through rates improved as subscribers found the emails more relevant and less intrusive.

Ahead of a Black Friday campaign, we strategically increased email frequency in the weeks leading up to the sale. This gradual approach helped build anticipation without overwhelming the audience, leading to stronger engagement when the promotion launched.

Harry LeCarpentierHarry LeCarpentier
Founder, Purple Cactus Creative


Use Event-Based Email Triggers

We tested frequency using volume triggers tied to our production cycle. If a customer hadn’t placed an order in 60 days, we sent a “last-supplied” alert with a reorder estimate based on their usual quantities. That bumped open rates to 47% and led to a 19% lift in follow-up orders. So, instead of weekly newsletters, we run “event-based” drops. Supply patterns dictate sends—not some made-up calendar.

We also learned fast that our audience doesn’t like fluff. Builders, site managers, warehouse ops—they scan. We cut the copy down to three lines. Lead with: “You’re probably running low on hi-vis.” Then show two product images. Done. That’s how you keep engagement high without bugging people. One good nudge beats three boring reminders.

Louis GeorgiouLouis Georgiou
Managing Director, Essential Workwear


10 Challenges Faced When Adjusting Email Marketing Cadence

10 Challenges Faced When Adjusting Email Marketing Cadence

10 Challenges Faced When Adjusting Email Marketing Cadence

Navigating the complexities of email marketing cadence can be daunting, but with the right strategies, success is within reach. This article delves into the top challenges marketers face, offering expert insights on how to overcome them effectively. Discover how to reframe email expectations, re-engage lost audiences, and more to optimize your email marketing efforts.

  • Reframe Email Expectations
  • Re-Engage Lost Audiences
  • Implement Dynamic Segmentation
  • Listen to Customer Feedback
  • Use Data to Guide Decisions
  • Balance Information Density
  • Let User Behavior Dictate Timing
  • Adopt a Behavior-Based Cadence
  • Tailor the Email Experience
  • Prioritize Content and Testing

Reframe Email Expectations

One challenge I faced when adjusting my email marketing cadence was maintaining engagement while reducing frequency. I used to send more frequent emails, but I realized that too many action-driven messages overwhelmed my audience—especially in marketing, where implementation takes time. When I scaled back to once a week, I noticed a drop in open rates at first.

The solution? Reframing expectations. I introduced a structured approach: one actionable email per week and, if I sent a second email, it was either a quick tip (with no CTA) or something time-sensitive. This made my emails feel more intentional rather than just another piece of inbox clutter. Over time, the engagement stabilized, open rates improved, and the list felt more responsive.

Lesson learned: Changing your cadence isn’t just about sending fewer or more emails—it’s about making sure each email has a clear purpose. If your audience understands what to expect and consistently finds value, they’ll stay engaged no matter the frequency shift.

Sascha HoffmannSascha Hoffmann
Lifecycle Marketing Consultant, SH Media


Re-Engage Lost Audiences

After seeing prolonged low open rates, we decided to stop sending emails to people who had not opened one of our messages in 30 days or more. This led to a huge decrease in our total sends, roughly a 70% decline. The issue was avoiding the connection between missing revenue goals and a decrease in total sends (as total opens didn’t change since the people we stopped sending to weren’t opening anyway).

Our solution was to build back out the funnel and re-engage the lost audiences. We funneled lost users into a retargeting Meta campaign to re-engage them with free downloads that were sent to them via email. This had them on the lookout for our emails, opening those emails, and then re-engaging with our brand.

We saw a 50% increase in engaged email users over a 6-month period, but our open rate doubled, so we were averaging about 50% more total opens per email than we were when we were sending to the full group. It felt like going on a diet… it wasn’t fun to cut out all the volume, but we ended up way healthier after sticking to the plan.

Jack NationsJack Nations
Marketing Manager, Colibri Group


Implement Dynamic Segmentation

For many brands that we work with, the biggest challenge is effective audience segmentation. Businesses often start with a one-size-fits-all approach, which eventually leads to subscriber fatigue and declining engagement rates, especially as your subscriber count grows into the tens of thousands.

To address this, we encourage implementing a dynamic segmentation strategy based on newsletter preferences, purchase history, and engagement levels (among other segments). By creating these segments with tailored content frequencies—ranging from weekly broadcasts for highly engaged customers to monthly broadcasts for less active subscribers—we saw a 42% improvement in click-through rates and a 35% reduction in unsubscribe rates. The key was moving from a static communication model to a responsive, data-driven approach that respected each subscriber’s individual preferences and interaction patterns.

Kar LoKar Lo
Email Marketing Specialist, Lo Marketing Company


Listen to Customer Feedback

Email marketing is a delicate balance. Too frequent, and you risk frustrating your audience. Too sparse, and you fade into the background. When we adjusted our email cadence, the biggest challenge was a sudden spike in unsubscribes. It was a wake-up call. One customer emailed us directly, saying, “I love your service, but I don’t need a reminder every week that I’m moving to Australia.” That stuck with me.

We stepped back and re-evaluated our approach. Instead of increasing frequency across the board, we introduced behavioral triggers. Customers received updates based on their actual moving timeline, not an arbitrary schedule. Engagement rebounded. Unsubscribes dropped. It was proof that listening—not just sending—makes the difference.

Hugh DixonHugh Dixon
Marketing Manager, PSS International Removals


Use Data to Guide Decisions

One challenge I faced when adjusting our email marketing cadence was striking the right balance between engagement and overwhelm. We were testing new frequency levels to see what our audience responded to best, but I noticed that when we sent more frequent emails, open rates dropped by about 12% in a couple of weeks. We realized that it wasn’t just about the number of emails but the content quality and timing that really mattered.

To address it, we pivoted by narrowing down our messaging to be more targeted and relevant to each segment of our audience. We also experimented with the timing, testing different days and times based on user behavior. This adjustment led to a 7% increase in click-through rates and a 9% improvement in overall engagement. It was a good reminder that adapting quickly and using data to guide decisions really pays off. It’s not about pushing more emails but understanding when and how to connect with your audience effectively.

Tracie CritesTracie Crites
Chief Marketing Officer, HEAVY Equipment Appraisal


Balance Information Density

Energy savings emails tend to perform well, but when we shifted from monthly to weekly emails, the click-through rate dropped from 12% to 7%. Customers who had previously engaged started ignoring messages, likely because they were seeing too many similar subject lines in their inbox. Saving money on electricity is important, but not urgent enough to warrant weekly updates for most people.

Reframing the email structure fixed the issue. Instead of sending full-length breakdowns every week, we switched to short, punchy “Did You Know?” emails with quick facts on savings opportunities. The longer, in-depth breakdowns returned to a monthly format. The mix of quick tips and detailed reports balanced out engagement, bringing click-through rates back up to 11% within two months. It turns out that sometimes, less information at a time is better when dealing with something as routine as electricity bills.

Benjamin TomBenjamin Tom
Digital Marketing Expert and Utility Specialist, Electricity Monster


Let User Behavior Dictate Timing

We were sending a ton of emails, but engagement was dropping, and unsubscribes were creeping up. The usual fixes, like adjusting frequency, tweaking subject lines, didn’t make much of a difference. After looking into the data, I saw that the issue wasn’t just the volume or content but the timing. Our emails were landing in inboxes at the worst possible moments. Either buried under other promotions in the morning or arriving when people weren’t actively thinking about buying or selling horses and equipment.

We’ve solved this by running a test using behavioral data from our website. We analyzed when individual subscribers were most active, looking at their browsing habits, what time they engaged with listings, and when they clicked on past emails. Sending emails simultaneously to everyone was not working, so we segmented our audience based on activity patterns. Users who browsed in the early morning received emails before 8 AM, while those more active in the evening got theirs after 7 PM. We even set up a dynamic send feature where emails were triggered based on a user’s most recent activity on our site.

Because of that, our open rates increased by 27%, click-through rates went up by 35%, and unsubscribes dropped by nearly 20%. Relying on standard email scheduling best practices did not work, so we let user behavior dictate when we reached out, and it made all the difference.

Linzi OliverLinzi Oliver
Commercial Marketing Manager, HorseClicks


Adopt a Behavior-Based Cadence

One challenge we encountered when adjusting our email marketing cadence was a dip in engagement when we increased email frequency. We assumed more emails meant better results, but instead, open rates dropped, and unsubscribes started creeping up.

To fix this, we shifted to a behavior-based cadence rather than a fixed schedule. Subscribers who actively engaged got more frequent updates, while those who showed less interest received fewer but more personalized emails. We also gave subscribers control over how often they wanted to hear from us, which helped reduce unsubscribes and improve retention.

This small shift made a big difference—engagement rebounded, and we found a rhythm that felt natural for our audience instead of overwhelming them.

Vikrant BhalodiaVikrant Bhalodia
Head of Marketing & People Ops, WeblineIndia


Tailor the Email Experience

Last year, I had some difficulty convincing internal stakeholders that when it comes to email – less is more.

Within our trial nurture sequence, we used to send at least 15 emails across a 14 day free trial, from three different email systems. Our product team often asked during go-to-market if we could add “just one more email” to our trial nurture about a new feature, in hopes their adoption metrics would improve.

Instead, I push for a “choose your own adventure” approach with email marketing. If a trial user shows they’re adopting quickly, and have some prior knowledge of how a CRM works, we start sending advanced content. But if they’re struggling to perform the basics, we send more detailed emails to help them along. We’ve since seen better adoption and conversion rates after tailoring the experience.

Jessica AndrewsJessica Andrews
VP Marketing, Copper


Prioritize Content and Testing

When I changed the email marketing cadence for one of our campaigns, the challenge was a sudden drop in engagement. We had been sending emails twice a week, and after increasing it to four times, open rates started falling. Unsubscribes spiked as well, which was an obvious sign that subscribers were overwhelmed. The goal was to keep the audience engaged, but instead, they were tuning out.

I analyzed the data and found that the first email still performed well, but the third and fourth were being ignored. Scaling back immediately was not the best approach, so I tested different adjustments. Emails were shortened, made more visually engaging, and given subject lines that created urgency or curiosity. On top of that, I segmented the list, sending all four emails only to the most engaged subscribers while keeping others on a lighter schedule.

A/B testing determined that curiosity-driven subject lines like “You’re Missing Out on This” performed 12% better than direct ones like “Your Exclusive Offer Ends Soon.” Shorter emails increased click-through rates by 9%. Using this data, I refined the campaign, leading to an 18% boost in open rates and a drop in unsubscribes. Frequency alone does not drive engagement. Audience behavior and content matter just as much, and testing helped find the right balance.

Sean ClancySean Clancy
Managing Director, SEO Gold Coast